Really I am…
Finally a real vampire
book… be-gone you sparkly skinned teenage wankers! Here be vampires. Considering I’d always thought I Am Legend
was more about mutants than vampires it was a pleasant surprise. From the films I’d always gotten the
impression that they were more the straight up mutant with just a couple
vampire tendencies thrown in.
However, I think
Richard Matheson uses a couple techniques that are really quite interesting and
usable for those of us even outside the genre.
Our Vampires Are
Different
You can thank tvtropes for that one, but the basics of the
technique are thus. No matter what the
monster in question is (or alien or nightmare or what have you…) you can make
it your own by changing a couple facets, removing or adding weaknesses and
other such things. Vampires and
werewolves have been so heavily used that in order for them to be interesting
they have to be tweaked to be different.
I Am Legend has vampires that are more traditional then some we
see these days but they’re still quite separate from the mythical basis.
I say he almost comes up with a scientific approach to the
vampirism (though they are vampires despite the science). He has taken the myth and modernized it while
giving the narrator enough intelligence to think about the differences. Mirrors and light cause fear instead of the traditional
(impossible to see and death), and other mythical facts that he plays straight
are even lamp-shaded. “Why does it have
to be wooden stakes?” and the talk about the garlic’s smell. It gives a lot more life to the masses of
blood sucking monsters banging on his door every night.
The Human Monster
There is something indelibly frightening about some mythical
creatures, but it seems to me that it is often those that are most like us that
are the most frightening. In a lot of
ways the Vampire and Werewolf are examples of carnal desires, base instincts,
and an inner ‘beast’ being let lose upon the world, but fundamentally… they are
or were people.
Matheson plays this up incredibly with his rendition of the
vampires and how Neville responds to them.
Their leader is ‘Benny’, they are the only women he’s seen in months,
and he’s completely alone. They throw
rocks, yell and scream, and the women dance naked in front of his house all to
get him to come out while Benny keeps calling on him to give up.
It’s not what you expect from a mob of vampires. What’s worse is that Neville’s isolation and
baser needs act almost like a monster… the women tempt him, sometimes he almost
loses control and rushes out to them.
The whole idea of a monster inside that is desperate to escape seems to
be a major thematic element of the Horror Genre. In a lot of ways the monsters we encounter
are renditions of our own demons lying in wait inside our own heads. The killing animal that our civilized selves
constantly strive to suppress.
Paul, nice analysis. I agree. I really liked the fact that Matheson chose to define the vampire through science and psychology than superstition and lore. The book was published in 1954, post-WWII, a time when science was really coming into its own. Matheson was really a trailblazer for the vampire story. I think many of the vampire stories today play on the genetic/disease aspects. Wasn't Blade with Wesley Snipes based on a viral infection? His story really holds up over the years. And, of course, you considered Neville the monster in this new world order; he has become a post-apocalyptic terrorist.
ReplyDelete